Both options have their advantages and disadvantages, but have important implications for the strategy in the medium/long term product life and must be taken into account. In this post we will address the specific case of the wireless sensor network products.
Lets first talk about the option of integration.
This option is characterized by OEM solutions that facilitate and accelerate our product development. Modules are usually used to give us an almost complete functionality through a programming API. The prime example in the case of wireless sensor networks would XBee modules from Digi. These modules provide almost complete functionality in terms of wireless communications, we get solved complicated issues such as programming of standard communication protocols (Zigbee in this case) and the always sensitive RF electronic development.
The advantages of the integrated option are obvious. This option allows us to significantly reduce the Time-To-Market of the product, while moved much of the communication problems to a specialized manufacturer. The disadvantages are the benefits of development option which we shall detail.
The development option changes the approach in comparisson to the intregration option, mainly in the scale at which we bring to design. This option will attempt to address the product development using elements of the lowest technological possible level . Obviously there is a financial limit under which technological development investments soar, which is the manufacture of integrated circuits. From here, the product developer will create its own electronic product itself and will face a long list of development stages, including radio communication designing and communication protocol implementation.
In general it is a long and complicated way, as greatter challenges are assumed than during integration of third party technologies. With the same effort expended, the Time-To-Market will be greater than in the case of the integration option but has a great advantage in the medium/long term: flexibility. This flexibility is found in two fields:
- Technological flexibility: The resulting product may be quickly adapted to market changes/demands. Needs response is faster, which is especially important in a growing market.
- Flexibility in costs: The fact of working at a lower level allows, having done the development, to offer a product whose manufacturing cost is significantly lower than the integration option. Furthermore, dependence on suppliers is smaller by having more supply and cost of product can be maintained and even improved by making a good supplier management.
At SAYME we have opted to develop our own product. It was a way not always easy, but both the team and the company have acquired a deep knowledge in product development whose result is the product SENSbee.
In any case, we work hard every day to make our product a better system that meets the needs of our customers and provide them a user experience as satisfying as the one we have had during product development.